Last week, President Trump ordered a review of the Nippon-U.S. Steel transaction, which Pres. Biden had prohibited at the end of his term. Experts say the “de novo” review (which means the Biden decision will have no bearing on the outcome) may be a first, with long-term implications for transaction parties.
Since we haven’t been able to find any hard data on potential nominees for the next Assistant Secretary for Investment Security, we did the next best thing: We asked GenAI. The results were surprising, with a host of interesting candidates based on criteria the models say the President Trump would himself use.
Last week, President Trump issued a sweeping national security memorandum that appears to transform CFIUS into a regime-specific entity. It also would “cease the use of overly bureaucratic, complex, and open-ended mitigation agreements.” Details and the memorandum are inside.
Well that didn’t take long. As many readers have already heard, former Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for Investment Security Paul Rosen has decamped for Latham & Watkins, where he’ll focus on CFIUS matters, outbound reviews and more. Stay tuned for an exclusive interview with Rosen.
As most Foreign Investment Watch readers know by now, President Biden has blocked Japanese steelmaker Nippon from acquiring U.S. Steel. Inside, we discuss with experts the impact of the decision for foreign investment reviews, including the implications for excepted foreign states.
Right on the heels of a report that detailed threats to the nation’s ports, Congressional leaders have sent a letter to Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen urging her to put U.S. Coast Guard facilities and other sensitive sites under CFIUS jurisdiction, and to allow for retroactive land purchase reviews. Details inside.
CFIUS head Paul Rosen disclosed over a year ago that penalties had been issued under the new enforcement guidelines, but the Committee has been relatively silent on details. Until now. Last week, CFIUS provided extensive details on penalties, and unveiled how “DONT” letters are being used.
The Corporate Transparency Act, which requires certain companies to disclose beneficial ownership information, became effective back in January. Experts now say the Act could theoretically help CFIUS in its ongoing search for non-notified transactions. Details, context and insights are inside.
As we mentioned in last week’s edition, the Treasury Department has proposed a new rule that would expand the number of military installations over which CFIUS has jurisdiction. This is the second expansion of the real estate provisions of FIRRMA in the last year, and it won’t be the last. Details inside.
A conservative activist group known for filing Freedom of Information Act requests and lawsuits has filed a FOIA lawsuit against Treasury seeking communications between CFIUS and the Agriculture Department. Details, insights, a list of other FOIA requests sent to CFIUS, and the lawsuit are inside.
The government contracting unit of Accenture has been awarded a $20 million contract to work on the CFIUS case management system and other “international affairs projects,” including the outbound investment program. The contract comes right on the heels of another we recently tracked.
Last week, T-Mobile announced that it would acquire almost all of UScellular, the fourth-largest wireless carrier in the U.S. The transaction raises a number of interesting national security questions, particularly related to a government-focused business unit that serves federal agencies.
President Biden has issued an order prohibiting the purchase of a cryptomining facility that was located within one mile of Francis E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming. According to the order, the buyer, MineOne, is “ultimately majority owned” by Chinese nationals. Details are inside.
Last week, the GAO published a 49-page report that evaluated how CFIUS and members agencies monitor nearly 230 active mitigation agreements and enforce compliance. Apparently, there’s some work to be done. Details, current shortcomings, and recommendations are summarized inside.
The Treasury Department has proposed a rule that would “enhance certain CFIUS procedures” and sharpen its penalty and enforcement authorities. The proposed changes reflect the Committee’s evolution and increased focus on monitoring, compliance, and enforcement. Details are inside.
According to some readers of Foreign Investment Watch, CFIUS has imposed National Security Agreements by order on a non-interim basis, and has done so without negotiating with the transactions parties. Experts say this would be an important development with far-reaching implications.
Last week, Foreign Investment Watch spent some time with a senior CFIUS official, who provided updates on recent staffing changes, and insights into the Committee’s priorities for 2024. According to the official, the first tranche of proposed changes to FIRRMA may come as early as Q1. Details inside.
Based on recent hearings and industry meetings, the Select Committee has published a policy paper with a staggering 150 recommendations for countering China. The document outlines flaws in the CFIUS model, and suggests tactics to improve the approach to national security. Details, report inside.
In case you missed it, the New York Times wrote an interesting piece on the national security implications of Chinese cryptomining facilities in the U.S., particularly near military facilities. This is not the first time the risk has been flagged, and it brings up interesting jurisdictional questions.
At the request of our readers, Foreign Investment Watch is creating a list of third-party monitors and auditors that are actively engaged with transaction parties on CFIUS-imposed National Security Agreements. We are asking readers to submit any TPMs or TPAs with whom they have worked.